Financial Crisis and Democratic Public Finance

The Financial Crisis and Democratic Public Finance by Leo Panitch.
First let’s be clear about capitalism — and with it the character of the state under capitalism.
There is a conventional assumption, a leftover of the cold war perhaps, that somehow
capitalism is essentially about the market and socialism is essentially about the state.

In fact, a central historical feature of the state in capitalist societies is the role it
plays as guarantor of private property and, most importantly for the smooth
running of the financial markets, that it will always honour its bonds,
that is, its borrowing from the private banks.

Because of this guarantee — promising to pay back from revenue from
taxation in the future — government bonds whether issued to finance war or
to finance welfare — is the least risky form of lending. As such, it is
the foundation of financial markets’ role in sustaining the ability of
capitalists generally to accumulate, i.e. continue to invest and make
profits.

This centrality of the state for capitalist accumulation is of
course most notable with respect to those dominant states, like the USA
whose currency is the main international currency and whose Treasury Bonds
are the foundation on which all calculations of value in global capitalism
are based; and which host and supports the main centres of international
financial markets, like New York and the City of London.

States and Financial Markets

Understanding the role of the state in a capitalist society helps us see
why when a government bails them out with public money the bankers do not
see this as the start of socialism! On the contrary, they see it as the
government fulfilling its duty to the financial markets — whose smooth
running it both depends on and sustains, by providing the basis of
confidence in the credibility of the banking system.

So it is misleading to see government involvement in the banks — whether
it was the pure bailout of the original Paulson program in the U.S., or the
subsequent non-controlling equities taken by the U.S., British and other
governments — as per se a move away even from neoliberalism.

It is also misleading to see neoliberalism as about the withdrawal of the state from
the markets — and therefore this current involvement of the state as a
defeat of neoliberalism. The state under neoliberalism has been very active
in promoting the vast expansion of financial markets and facilitating their
volatile growth; and as this volatility inevitably led to repeated
financial crises in keeping the financial system going from moments of
chaos to moments of chaos.

Does this mean that this present crisis of the financial markets is not an
opportunity to debate and press for alternatives? And where do we start?

It is an opportunity because in this crisis it is clear that what has been
misleadingly billed as the ‘free market’ has failed and is seen to have
failed, and also because it is clear that states have been responsible for
promoting what has now failed, and that they now need to come to the rescue
of the banks.

And this concentrates the minds of most people on the
problem: their paychecks are deposited with banks, their pension savings
are invested in the stock market, their consumption is reliant on bank
credit, and is the roof over the heads, as heavily mortgaged home owners.

Nationalization: Banks as Public Utilities?

It is notable in this respect that going back over the last century,
alongside the various movements that arose to struggle for the vote for
working people there has always been pressure to control the financial
system, and even to bring the banks under public ownership, reflecting a
certain common sense that the financial system ought to be accountable to
or even belong to the people — that money should be become a public
resource and banks a public utility.

Indeed this democratic pressure system
was not without results: some of the regulations that states did of bank
system after previous crises was also a response to demands from below that
people that not be fleeced by the bankers.

For example, the nationalization of the Bank of England was meant to bring
the government’s agent in the financial markets under democratic control
but in fact The Bank of England now acted inside the state as the voice of
the City within the state, representing there the power of financial
capital.

The lessons began to be learnt in the wake of the rise of the new left and
the crisis of the Keynesian welfare state in the 1970s. They recognized
that the only way to overcome the contradictions of the Keynesian welfare
state in a positive manner was to take the financial system into public
control. The left in the British Labour Party were able to secure the
passage of a conference resolution to nationalize the big banks and
insurance companies in the City of London, albeit with no effect on a
Labour Government that embraced one of the IMF’s first structural
adjustment programs. We are still paying for the defeat of these ideas. It
is now necessary to build on their proposals and make them relevant in the
current conjuncture. (The best popularly written example of this coming out
the earlier period, and still worth reading today, is Richard Minns, Take
over the City: The case for public ownership of financial institutions,
London, Pluto 1982.)

The scale of the crisis today provides an opening for the renewal of
radical politics that advances a systemic alternative to capitalism.

It would be a tragedy if a far more ambitious goal than making financial
capital more prudent did not now come back on the agenda.

It hard to see how anyone can be serious about converting our economy to green priorities
without understanding that we need a democratic means of planning through
new sets of public institutions that would enable us to take collective
decisions about allocating resources for what we produce and how and where
we produce the things we need to sustain our lives and our relationship to
our environment. The reasons trading in carbon offsets as a solution to the
climate crisis is a dead end is shown in this financial crisis. It involves
depending on the kinds of derivatives market that are so volatile and are
so inherently open to financial manipulation and to financial crashes.

In terms of immediate reforms — in a situation where the only safe debt is
public debt — this should start with demands for vast programs to provide
for collective services and infrastructures that not only compensate for
those that have atrophied but meet new definitions of basic human needs and
come to terms with today’s ecological challenges.

Such reforms would soon come up against the limits posed by the
reproduction of capitalism. This is why it is so important to raise not
merely the regulation of finance but the transformation and democratization
of the whole financial system.

What is in fact needed is to turn the whole banking system into a public utility
so that the distribution of credit and capital would be undertaken in conformity with
democratically established priorities rather than short term profit.

This would have to involve not only capital controls in relation to international finance
but also controls over domestic investment, since the point of taking control over
finance is to transform the uses to which it is now put. And it would also
require much more than this in terms of the democratization of both the
broader economy and the state.

Of course, without rebuilding popular class forces through new movements
and parties this will fall on empty ground. But crucial to this rebuilding
is to get people to think ambitiously again. However deep the crisis,
however confused and demoralised the financial elite inside and outside the
state, and however widespread the popular outrage against them, this will
require hard and committed work by a great many activists. We will need to
put our minds to the hard questions of what the new institutions of
democratic public finance would look like — and what kinds of movements
would be needed to build them. •

Leo Panitch edits The Socialist Register and teaches political economy at
York University. Also in Red Pepper, at
www.redpepper.org.uk.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(((( T h e B u l l e t))))~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Bullet is produced by the Socialist Project. Readers are
encouraged to distribute widely. Comments, criticisms and
suggestions are welcome. Write to info@socialistproject.ca

Socialist project logo

If you wish to subscribe:

http://www.socialistproject.ca/lists/?p=subscribe

For more analysis of contemporary politics check out
‘Relay: A Socialist Project Review’ at

http://www.socialistproject.ca/relay

Financial crisis and democratic public finance